The United Conservative Party (UCP) passed all of its policy resolutions this weekend. The two-tiered health-care system in Alberta is a doozy. It won’t be any surprise to hear it gets challenged in court. It would seem to violate Section 3 of the Canada Health Act, RSC 1985 c C-6:
It is hereby declared that the primary objective of Canadian health care policy is to protect, promote and restore the physical and mental well-being of residents of Canada and to facilitate reasonable access to health services without financial or other barriers.
NDP Health Critic Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) is calling on the federal government to enforce the Canada Health Act and stand up to Alberta Premier Jason Kenney’s plan to privatize orthopedic surgeries.
“Jason Kenney’s privatization agenda will create a two-tiered health care system that violates our most basic principles of equal access and will hurt the quality of care,” said Davies. “We are calling on federal Health Minister Hadju to make it clear that this will not be tolerated.”
Unfortunately, the government may not be able to afford a challenge to this policy. In Policy 1, they want to add a new bullet: The United Conservative Party is committed to: c) operating within its means and reducing the size of the provincial debt.
They’ve already given our healthcare money to foreign owned oil & gas companies. No doubt, this is why we need a two-tiered health-care system.
Might be worth a look to see what other goodies are in this.
Oil Change International Senior Research Analyst Kelly Trout points to the IEA’s long history of “consistently overestimated the expected role of fossil fuels in the global energy system and consistently underestimated the growth of renewables”. And Thomas Gunton, a director of Simon Fraser University’s Resource and Environmental Planning Program, cites the IEA’s findings and BP’s recent forecasts as the latest evidence against continuing construction of the C$12.6-billion Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.
“At the same time that demand is declining and oil producers are cutting back, Canada is expanding its oil pipeline capacity by just over 2.4 million barrels per day,” he writes. Pre-pandemic projections for western Canadian oil production showed expansion of no more than 1.2 million barrels per day through 2030, yet Trans Mountain was just one of several pipeline projects on the books, large and small.
“While some pipeline expansion may be warranted, spending $12.6 billion of taxpayer funds to build a pipeline when private sector companies are adding more than enough capacity to meet Canada’s need without any taxpayer support is hard to justify,” he writes.
“Ironically, the oil sector may also be adversely impacted by building the Trans Mountain expansion, because shipping tolls will have to be increased to cover the costs of redundant pipeline capacity. This will reduce oil company profits and tax payments to government.”
Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s performance in Ottawa still negatively affects Canada. Some rights and freedoms citizens enjoyed before they were stripped of them have never been recovered. With a federal election in the cards for 2015, people were crying, “Anyone But Harper.” This was echoed among the broadest range of people, even those who consider themselves die-hard Conservatives. The concept of “strategic voting” became popular, as a loosely organized plan to see that this man would not be re-elected.
Canadians felt hated. The Harper government hated taxpayers and voters. Policies were developed that proved this to be true. It ended an era where elected parties were more civilized and developed policy controls, and specific projects that would be beneficial to the public. They understood their positions meant they served the public interest.
Maude Barlow is a Canadian author and activist. She is a founding member of the Council of Canadians, a citizens’ advocacy organization with members and chapters across Canada. In a report she wrote, titled the “Broken Covenant,” in 2015, she reminisces about former prime ministers’ most noted contributions to our society. Prior to Mr. Harper, she said, “Over the better part of the last 75 years, successive federal governments have helped to build a strong civil society presence in our country.”
“Governments have funded rights movements, such as those for women, refugees and gays; environmental groups and independent environmental research; indigenous health, healing and education programs as well as the more formal indigenous institutions such as provincial and federal chiefs’ associations; legal advocacy groups that speak for the disadvantaged and challenge the status quo; civil society organizations that promote good health and maintain independent statistics; anti-poverty groups and non-governmental welfare research programs; union advocacy on behalf of working people; farmer co-ops and programs to support food producers and rural communities; and cultural programs and artists to promote Canadian culture at home and to the world.”
The report is a scathing indictment of nine years of Harper’s agenda. Broken Covenant examines the Harper government’s impact on our democratic institutions, families and workers, women, First Nations, the environment, health care, arts and culture, farmers, human rights and social equality.
Broken Covenant tells the story of “a government bent on forever changing the relationship between our elected officials and the citizens it represents.”
And change, it certainly did.
It’s led to a breed of men getting elected under the Conservative banner whose sole purpose is to line their pockets and find corporations they can cater to who will in turn keep them in power with their lobbying dollars and influence. The focus of these men is to use their corporate backers to sway votes, policies and influence. They are no longer interested in building a strong civil society. They’ve reduced the number of the middle class, encouraged mobility upwards for those with influence and cash and stripped the poor of a lot of social services and support systems. Researchers, non-profits, and agencies in place to advocate for the poor have been defunded of government support or received decreased payments to a point where very little can be accomplished. If you don’t know there’s a problem — then there isn’t one.
Stephen Harper’s government had a negative impact on all Canadians, most notably in areas such as:
Democracy
Social equality
Workers
Women
First Nations
Environment
Health care
Culture
Farmers
Human rights
Is Stephen Harper pulling Jason Kenney’s strings?
Kenney was a cabinet minister in Stephen Harper’s Conservative government. He recently hired Mr. Harper’s son, Ben, as a policy advisor for his office. Harper and Kenney have always been close, but reading through the report almost gives one an itemized itinerary in the direction of the Alberta government. It seems the premier is carrying on with the work Harper was trying to accomplish before Canadians were so desperate to get rid of him.
Accordingly, Kenney’s accomplishments are on a provincial rather than a federal platform. Reading this report will make you shudder to think he may have an eye on being prime minister. There are a lot of startling similarities. It gives one a good idea on just how far Kenney is willing to go.
Pieridae Energy has a $10 billion idea to send natural gas to a refinery in Goldboro, Nova Scotia. It’s a rather ambitious endeavour backed by a US$4.5 billion loan guarantee from Uniper in Germany. They want natural gas that hasn’t been obtained by fracking. Most of the gas in Canada comes from fracking wells. Besides, once it’s in the pipeline, who can tell the difference?
‘Cept there isn’t a refinery in Goldboro. Unfortunately, they’re going to build it. Luckily there doesn’t seem to be any shortage of investments in the project. According to Jessica Ernst it’s financed by AIMCo and about $10Billion in liabilities.
CEO Alfred Sorensen says the project will take advantage of existing pipelines so no new pipelines will be needed. It isn’t clear how all of this natural gas will be sourced. They were going to buy some of Shell’s old rusty wells and assets. However, the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) blocked the licence transfers over environmental concerns.
There was a webinar held recently and uploaded to Youtube on Oct. 8. It gives a good overview of the project and has some discussion on how it could go ahead. It’s fairly long, but a presentation starting about twelve-minutes into the video sums the majority of it up nicely and it’s only takes about twenty minutes.
In this presentation it shows where a new pipeline will be needed from Quebec. This isn’t clear, as other texts have said no new pipelines are needed. click here to open the map
In some stretch of the imagination, Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet claimed sole credit for killing the Energy East pipeline. That’s disputable, but then if a new pipeline is needed for this project, perhaps he’ll get a chance to further his claim by blocking this too.
Here is what you can expect from watching the whole webinar:
Germany has now finally decided to phase out coal for 2038 – much too late, as climate activists criticise. At the same time, however, it is this delayed and inadequate coal phase-out that is being used as an opportunity to announce a new era of fossil gas. This is happening at a time when scientific evidence shows that fossil gas – especially extracted through the fracking technique – is contributing massively to global warming.Furthermore, it is now pretty clear that we have only 10 – 30 years at most to prevent the worst climate catastrophy.
Nevertheless, the German government is supporting the Russian Nord Stream 2 pipeline and at the same time it is promoting the construction of import terminals for fracked gas in northern Germany. In addition, the same government is providing loan guarantees for the expansion of gas infrastructure in the form of liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals abroad, e.g. in Canada.
The Canadian company Pieridae Energy is planning to build the Goldboro LNG export terminal in Nova Scotia and has already signed in 2013 a 20-year supply contract with Uniper, a company involved in the Russian Nord Stream 2 pipeline and the Wilhelmshaven LNG terminal..
Apart from the fact that Pieridae will probably have to rely on fracked gas from Canada and the USA to feed the terminal with the contractually guaranteed quantities of gas, the project has been on rather shaky financial footing for 7 years now.
The Canadian investor desperately relies on a credit loan guarantee from the German government and has even engaged a subsidiary of the state-owned bank Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) for lobbying the government.
This online seminar offers in particular Canadian activists the opportunity to present local perspectives and regional impacts of the project to a larger international audience. In addition, the contributions should make clear that the financially highly risky project is dependent on fracked gas from the USA and Canada and, moreover, cannot be realized at all without German support in the form of a credit guarantee from the German government. The discussion will address, among other things, the question of whether the construction of new infrastructure for fossil fuels is compatible with a reduction in the use of fossil gas in the interests of the climate targets and what role the German Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) plays in financing such projects.
With:
Andy Gheorghiu, Food and Water Action Europe
Regine Richter, Urgewald
Constantin Zerger, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V.
Activists from Nova Scotia – Canada
Moderator: Nadine Bethge, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V.
Public hearings for Benga Mining Ltd.’s proposed Grassy Mountain Coal Project in the Crowsnest Pass will begin on October 27. The hearings, which will be held online and are expected to go until December 2, are the next step in the federal impact assessment. The proposed project includes the construction and operation of an open-pit metallurgical coal mine near Blairmore. Construction is expected to take up to two years, and operation will last up to 25 years.
Click here to see a short video on poisoning the watershed
Grassy Mountain is the first of at least six mountain-top removal coal mines proposed by large Australian mining companies in various stages of regulatory approval in the region. More than 50,000 ha of the Old Man River headwaters are under lease for future mining.